Asparagus with Hollandaise Sauce - POSTED ON: Apr 09, 2011
Makes 1 serving
Ingredients:
6 pieces Asparagus, boiled, drained Sauce: 1/4 cup (1/2 stick) butter 1 package dry McCormick Hollandaise Sauce Mix 1 cup water
Directions:
Break woody ends off 6 stalks of Asparagus, and steam for about 4-5 minutes. Spray non-stick coating on small saucepan Melt butter in pan Stir in Sauce mix Whisk in 1 cup water. Bring to a boil while stirring continuously then simmer for about 1 minute until sauce thickens. 2 Tablespoons is 1 serving. 6 stalks of asparagus and 2 TB Hollandaise Sauce =1 serving 1 serving is:
Calories: 70 Carbs: 4.3 grams Protein 2.4 grams
Starvation Mode - POSTED ON: Apr 07, 2011
Here is a picture of the men who were in "Starvation mode during the famous 1940s Minnesota Starvation Research project of Dr. Ancel Keys.
People online tend to throw around the term "starvation mode" quite a bit. I've done a great deal of research on this issue,and as a result of my study, I agree with the Experts who say that "starvation mode"...as it is commonly defined...is a Dieting Myth. Starvation mode doesn't happen until one is actually starving. Bottom line, unless you are genetically like one of those Zucker rats that Gary Taubes talks about in "Why We Get Fat And What To Do About It"if you have more body fat than the picture above, you aren't in "starvation mode". I very much like this quote from Brad Pilon, author of Eat Stop Eat, on the Metabolism issue:
"Unless you have a degree in human biology…and in many cases even if you do…you do not understand what ‘metabolism’ means. Eating Less Calories isn't Dangerous for your Metabolism, This word gets thrown around the fitness and diet media and is used to scare people into thinking there is a dangerous level of calories that will destroy their metabolism. This of course is a false premise considering your ‘metabolism’ isn’t a thing that can be destroyed or sped up or slowed down (not without drugs). “Metabolism’ is just the sum of the processes of your body on a cellular/systemic level...that’s it…that’s all it’s ever been…nothing more. So what…who cares. Why do fitness marketers keep talking about it?! I’ll never know. And there is virtually nothing you can do to change this. Eating at or below your actual BMR isn’t going to ‘damage’ your metabolism any more than eating above it. And speaking of which, why don’t marketers suggest that there could be ‘metabolic damage’ when people overeat!?…anyone…anyone? Right, just what I thought, this lie doesn’t lead to lucrative weight loss products. The following claims are false, and are your best way to know that a person is clueless about biology and physiology and nutrition if they say: "Eating too few calories is going to ’slow’ your metabolism" (unless they’re referring to people who are starving to death…and are in fact about to die) "That there are foods that can ‘damage’ your metabolism" That you can speed up or slow down your metabolism (without drugs…and that this would be a good thing in either direction) That a slow metabolism is responsible for weight gain That a fast metabolism is responsible for weight loss That you have any control whatsoever over your metabolic rate That your meal timing ...
"Unless you have a degree in human biology…and in many cases even if you do…you do not understand what ‘metabolism’ means. Eating Less Calories isn't Dangerous for your Metabolism, This word gets thrown around the fitness and diet media and is used to scare people into thinking there is a dangerous level of calories that will destroy their metabolism. This of course is a false premise considering your ‘metabolism’ isn’t a thing that can be destroyed or sped up or slowed down (not without drugs). “Metabolism’ is just the sum of the processes of your body on a cellular/systemic level...that’s it…that’s all it’s ever been…nothing more. So what…who cares. Why do fitness marketers keep talking about it?! I’ll never know. And there is virtually nothing you can do to change this. Eating at or below your actual BMR isn’t going to ‘damage’ your metabolism any more than eating above it. And speaking of which, why don’t marketers suggest that there could be ‘metabolic damage’ when people overeat!?…anyone…anyone? Right, just what I thought, this lie doesn’t lead to lucrative weight loss products. The following claims are false, and are your best way to know that a person is clueless about biology and physiology and nutrition if they say:
"Eating too few calories is going to ’slow’ your metabolism" (unless they’re referring to people who are starving to death…and are in fact about to die) "That there are foods that can ‘damage’ your metabolism" That you can speed up or slow down your metabolism (without drugs…and that this would be a good thing in either direction) That a slow metabolism is responsible for weight gain That a fast metabolism is responsible for weight loss That you have any control whatsoever over your metabolic rate That your meal timing ...
Habit vs. Willpower - POSTED ON: Apr 06, 2011
Successful weight-loss requires establishing new eating Habits. For successful maintenance of that weight-loss, one must create a new “normal” which is based on those Habits.
A Habit is a settled tendency or usual manner of behavior. Specifically here, a behavior pattern acquired by frequent repetition that shows itself in regularity or increased facility of performance; and an acquired mode of behavior that has become nearly or completely involuntary.
Habit comes from repeated behavior.
Willpower is defined as energetic determination.
Willpower and Habit are related. because Habits are ESTABLISHED… i.e. brought into existence via some act of will… …..one’s choice or determination… and it initially takes willpower to establish a habit.
Body Mass Index: What about the BMI? - POSTED ON: Apr 04, 2011
No one wants to be in the "Obese" category, because that label goes past a little bit "Overweight", and defines one as actually too "Fat".
The numbers I previously posted in "Normal, Overweight, or Obese" are standard BMI (Body Mass Index) numbers. BMI categories are:
• Underweight = <18.5 • Normal weight = 18.5–24.9 • Overweight = 25–29.9 • Obesity = BMI of 30 or greater
Many athletic people who are carrying a lot of muscle under their fat strongly protest that their muscles make them an exception, and therefore they don't fall into the standard BMI categories. However the following quote from Bodybuilding expert, John Barban, is very on Point about this issue. QUOTE:
BMI chart – What is all the Fuss About?
I was reading a blog about the BMI (Body Mass Index) chart the other day and noticed that many people were saying that it’s not accurate and is an outdated measurement and needs to be replaced/revised. So I started to think about why anyone would say this. The BMI chart was created over 100 years ago as a way of charting body ‘fatness’ or ‘thinness’. With the influence of Ancel Keys (visionary scientist way ahead of his time) BMI became a prominent tool in the 1970′s for assessing population health risks. There is a criticism that the BMI doesn’t account for different ‘frame’ sizes of people (endomorphs and ectomorphs) or athletes who have built up their muscles to a much larger degree than the regular population. Both of these criticism’s seem to be weak as true ecotmorphic or endomorphic people are very rare…in other words, for MOST of the population the BMI works just fine, and that was the point in the first place. The athlete argument doesn’t hold much water either, as they represent a very small percentage of the population and many of them at all levels use steroids and other drugs that artificially elevate their lean body mass. In other words, the BMI was never meant to be applied to people taking steroids and GH. So what about ‘natural’ athletes and bodybuilders who don’t use drugs but just build lots of muscles? Surely they wouldn’t be in the ‘normal’ BMI range…right? Wrong!
I was reading a blog about the BMI (Body Mass Index) chart the other day and noticed that many people were saying that it’s not accurate and is an outdated measurement and needs to be replaced/revised.
So I started to think about why anyone would say this. The BMI chart was created over 100 years ago as a way of charting body ‘fatness’ or ‘thinness’. With the influence of Ancel Keys (visionary scientist way ahead of his time) BMI became a prominent tool in the 1970′s for assessing population health risks.
There is a criticism that the BMI doesn’t account for different ‘frame’ sizes of people (endomorphs and ectomorphs) or athletes who have built up their muscles to a much larger degree than the regular population. Both of these criticism’s seem to be weak as true ecotmorphic or endomorphic people are very rare…in other words, for MOST of the population the BMI works just fine, and that was the point in the first place.
The athlete argument doesn’t hold much water either, as they represent a very small percentage of the population and many of them at all levels use steroids and other drugs that artificially elevate their lean body mass. In other words, the BMI was never meant to be applied to people taking steroids and GH.
So what about ‘natural’ athletes and bodybuilders who don’t use drugs but just build lots of muscles? Surely they wouldn’t be in the ‘normal’ BMI range…right? Wrong!
Giving Up Is Not An Option - POSTED ON: Apr 01, 2011
Many of us have preconceived expectations when we start our weight-loss journey, as to how long it will take.
We think that by doing everything to a T, everything will go as planned. But many times that is not the case.
We must learn to accept the obstacles that are inevitable in this journey, knowing that the end is not what makes us who we are or who we were meant to be. It is the journey of overcoming obstacles that defines who we are and who we are meant to be.
Giving up is not an option.
Mar 01, 2021 DietHobby: A Digital Scrapbook. 2000+ Blogs and 500+ Videos in DietHobby reflect my personal experience in weight-loss and maintenance. One-size-doesn't-fit-all, and I address many ways-of-eating whenever they become interesting or applicable to me.
Jun 01, 2020 DietHobby is my Personal Blog Website. DietHobby sells nothing; posts no advertisements; accepts no contributions. It does not recommend or endorse any specific diets, ways-of-eating, lifestyles, supplements, foods, products, activities, or memberships.
May 01, 2017 DietHobby is Mobile-Friendly. Technical changes! It is now easier to view DietHobby on iPhones and other mobile devices.